Re: adjusting coreutils to gettext 0.15

2006-08-11 Thread Eric Blake-1
> I installed the following to adjust better to gettext 0.15. > +++ configure.ac 10 Aug 2006 22:47:50 - > @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ AC_CHECK_DECLS([strtoimax, strtoumax]) > cu_LIB_CHECK > > AM_GNU_GETTEXT([external], [need-ngettext]) > -AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION(0.13.1) > +AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSI

Re: It's 2007

2007-01-04 Thread Eric Blake-1
> You should like this, then. > I prefer to use version-etc.c, for consistency. Indeed, much better. Thanks for putting up with my complaints. -- Eric Blake -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-It%27s-2007-tf2919384.html#a8160463 Sent from the Gnu - Coreutils - Discu

Re: [PATCH] Command line parsing of ls with genparse

2007-08-28 Thread Eric Blake-1
> 1. The usage function for the ls command has the following >explanation for the -F, --classify command liune switch: >"append indicator (one of */=>@|) to entries". Can you rewrite it as "append indicator (one of *" "/=>@|) to entries", and rely on string concatenation to produce the s

Re: [PATCH] Command line parsing of ls with genparse

2007-08-28 Thread Eric Blake-1
> 2. ls.c depends ls-clp.h (the generated parser) >ls-clp.h depends on ls.gp (the genparse file) >ls.gp depends on ls.c because ls.gp is embedded as a comment in ls.c >-> There is a circular dependency! That seems wrong to me. Isn't it really: ls$(EXEEXT) directly depends on ls.o an

GNU_PACKAGE vs. PACKAGE_NAME

2007-08-30 Thread Eric Blake-1
This reduces the size of configure and the generated config.h a bit, by using autoconf's PACKAGE_NAME rather than a hand-rolled GNU_PACKAGE expanding to the same string. I did not alter whether the package name should be "GNU coreutils" (the current name) or "GNU Coreutils" (more in line with oth