On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:06:35PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> Hi Pádraig,
>
>
> Pádraig Brady writes:
>
> > How different exactly?
> > OK I tried this myself on F11 with inconclusive results.
>
> I can't replicate it now, all tests I am doing report that blocks used
> before and after t
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:14:49PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:06:35PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> >>
> >> I can't replicate it now, all tests I am doing report that blocks used
> >> before an
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:10:14PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:14:49PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > Chris Mason wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:06:35PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I can't rep
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:50:47PM +0800, Jian Lin wrote:
> Thanks. I will try the new version soon.
Note that you'll have to reclone the files, the new version won't fix
the old clone I'm afraid.
-chris
Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of 2011-02-19 19:53:18 -0500:
> 2011/2/19 Pádraig Brady:
> > On 19/02/11 18:28, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> based on other threads (which i havent been following too closely), did we
> >> settle on this being a btrfs bug ?
> >
> > Nope, cp 8.10 is not absolved
