bug#49716: no -print0 for ls?

2021-07-28 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 28/07/2021 02:14, Paul Eggert wrote: On 7/26/21 8:00 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: So I'd have a slight preference for --zero. Also what about having --zero imply:   --quoting-style=literal --show-control-chars --format=single-column That seems like a fine shortcut given that would be correct

bug#49716: no -print0 for ls?

2021-07-28 Thread Vito Caputo
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:57:38PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 28/07/2021 02:14, Paul Eggert wrote: > > On 7/26/21 8:00 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > > > > So I'd have a slight preference for --zero. > > > > > > Also what about having --zero imply: > > >   --quoting-style=literal --show-con

bug#49716: no -print0 for ls?

2021-07-28 Thread Paul Eggert
On 7/28/21 4:57 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: I see --zero implies --format=single-column, but allows --format=long. That's the right default, but also most flexible. Yes, it's a little tricky here. For quite some time the ls -1 (digit 1 option) code has disagreed with its documentation. The doc s

bug#49764: tr invocation INFO page missing list of options

2021-07-28 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
(info "(coreutils) tr invocation") all the options don't appear together on the same page. Only the man page's DESCRIPTION has them all together.