Am I going senile here or does ls really not have a `find -print0`
equivalent?
Thanks,
Vito Caputo
tag 49716 notabug
close 49716
stop
On 24/07/2021 08:03, Vito Caputo wrote:
Am I going senile here or does ls really not have a `find -print0`
equivalent?
This was previously discussed as noted at:
https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/rejected_requests.html#ls
In summary, ls output is mainly
On 24/07/2021 17:34, Vito Caputo wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 02:22:14PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 24/07/2021 08:03, Vito Caputo wrote:
Am I going senile here or does ls really not have a `find -print0`
equivalent?
This was previously discussed as noted at:
https://www.gnu.org/software
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 02:22:14PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 24/07/2021 08:03, Vito Caputo wrote:
> > Am I going senile here or does ls really not have a `find -print0`
> > equivalent?
>
> This was previously discussed as noted at:
> https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/rejected_requests.
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 06:05:10PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 24/07/2021 17:34, Vito Caputo wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 02:22:14PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > > On 24/07/2021 08:03, Vito Caputo wrote:
> > > > Am I going senile here or does ls really not have a `find -print0`
> > >
On 7/24/21 10:48 AM, Vito Caputo wrote:
Couldn't we make
-0 and any aliases shorthand for a new --format=WORD where WORD is
names0 or something. That way it's automatically mutually exclusive
with the other formats?
It would make sense to invent a new --quoting-style='literal0' option
(by ana
