On 05/06/2013 07:54 PM, Cojocaru Alexandru wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:59:20 +0100
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
>> So I reinstated the bit vector which was a little tricky
>> to do while maintaining performance, but it works very well.
> I think it works because we are avoiding a memory access
>
On 05/07/2013 01:10 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 07:54 PM, Cojocaru Alexandru wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:59:20 +0100
>> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>
>>> So I reinstated the bit vector which was a little tricky
>>> to do while maintaining performance, but it works very well.
>> I think
> On May 7, 2013 at 2:10 PM Pádraig Brady wrote:
> It's always best to have separate changes.
> I've split the fix out (attached) with an associated test.
The patch looks fine, thanks.
Have a nice day,
Berny
> On May 7, 2013 at 3:51 PM Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I'll apply the attached in a little while.
+1
Have a nice day,
Berny
