bug#13210: [PATCH] maint: cygwin build broken

2012-12-19 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 12/17/2012 11:20 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 12/17/2012 11:50 AM, Z. Majeed wrote: Building latest git source in a non-src directory on cygwin win7 with gcc 4.5.3 is broken I had to configure --disable-gcc-warnings to avoid the following errors because gcc 4.5.3 is the latest on cygwin

bug#13210: [PATCH] maint: cygwin build broken

2012-12-19 Thread Z. Majeed
Thanks for fixing all the issues - are you folks open to adding a ginstall.exe manifest for the cygwin build? Zartaj --- On Mon, 12/17/12, Z. Majeed wrote: > You're probably right about the mkdir > doc hack - I think I added it based on a similar rule for > another subdir - the win7 elevation

bug#13210: [PATCH] maint: cygwin build broken

2012-12-19 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 12/19/2012 12:57 PM, Z. Majeed wrote: Thanks for fixing all the issues - are you folks open to adding a ginstall.exe manifest for the cygwin build? I presume the cygwin package puts one in place, and it would be nice to keep windows specific stuff there. There is a related thread here: http

bug#13210: [PATCH] maint: cygwin build broken

2012-12-19 Thread Eric Blake
On 12/19/2012 06:25 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 12/19/2012 12:57 PM, Z. Majeed wrote: >> Thanks for fixing all the issues - are you folks open to adding a >> ginstall.exe manifest for the cygwin build? > > I presume the cygwin package puts one in place, > and it would be nice to keep windows spe

bug#13210: [PATCH] maint: cygwin build broken

2012-12-19 Thread Eric Blake
On 12/19/2012 03:23 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > But I think the attached coreutils patch > which just avoids auto enabling all these gcc > warnings on older compilers is more appropriate. I like the idea of only enabling the warnings on newer gcc. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com+1-919-30

bug#13210: [PATCH] maint: cygwin build broken

2012-12-19 Thread Z. Majeed
or maybe there aren't many people building on cygwin because of issues like the ones I reported - cygwin packages can fall quite behind and coreutils is not available on cygwinports either - I know I was close to giving up and just working on linux Zartaj --- On Wed, 12/19/12, Eric Blake wrot

bug#13210: [PATCH] maint: cygwin build broken

2012-12-19 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/19/2012 07:46 AM, Z. Majeed wrote: I know I was close to giving up and just working on linux That's not giving up!

bug#13227: seq -s broken in coretutils 8.20?

2012-12-19 Thread Philipp Gortan
Dear coreutils crowd, I recently upgraded the coreutils on my Gentoo AMD64 from 8.16 to 8.20. I used the seq command to generate the values of an SQL "in" statement. Since I upgraded, the SQL is no longer correct - here is what I found out: $ seq -s, 6 9; seq --version 6 7,8,9,seq (GNU coreutils

bug#13227: seq -s broken in coretutils 8.20?

2012-12-19 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 12/19/2012 04:53 PM, Philipp Gortan wrote: Dear coreutils crowd, I recently upgraded the coreutils on my Gentoo AMD64 from 8.16 to 8.20. I used the seq command to generate the values of an SQL "in" statement. Since I upgraded, the SQL is no longer correct - here is what I found out: $ seq -s

bug#13227: seq -s broken in coretutils 8.20?

2012-12-19 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 12/19/2012 07:01 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 12/19/2012 04:53 PM, Philipp Gortan wrote: Dear coreutils crowd, I recently upgraded the coreutils on my Gentoo AMD64 from 8.16 to 8.20. I used the seq command to generate the values of an SQL "in" statement. Since I upgraded, the SQL is no longer

bug#13227: seq -s broken in coretutils 8.20?

2012-12-19 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 12/20/2012 01:33 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > The attached should fix it. The patch looks good, thanks. Have a nice day, Berny

bug#13118: [PATCH] factor: disable longlong.h logic for x32 builds

2012-12-19 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 12/07/2012 08:55 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 12/07/2012 08:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: The current x86_64 asm code does not work for x32 ABIs, so disable it until someone can fix it. Simply deleting the q suffix is not enough. * src/longlong.h: Check for __ILP32__ for x86_64 targets. ---

bug#13118: [PATCH] factor: disable longlong.h logic for x32 builds

2012-12-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 21:29:50 Pádraig Brady wrote: > Was this a runtime or build time issue BTW? > What was the failure mode if runtime? build time. the asm code was rejected due to mismatched constraints. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.