On 12/13/2012 02:37 PM, coni wrote:
> Hi i've got a warning message in tail command:
> "tail -f /vc/log/apache2/access_log" - report to bug.
>
> tail (GNU coreutils) 8.20
> Packaged by Gentoo (8.20 (p1.0))
>
> - file system type ceph
>
> message:
>
> tail: unrecognized file system type 0x0
On 12/14/2012 09:18 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
+case S_MAGIC_CEPH: /* 0x00c36400 remote */
+ return "ceph";
s/00c/00C/ for consistency
thanks for handling this.
Pádraig.
Hi,
I want to use tail and grep to follow a file until a particular pattern
appears. But tail does not exit when grep is finished.
$ echo xxx > /tmp/blabla
$ tail -f /tmp/blabla |grep -m1 --line-buffered "xxx"
xxx
Now tail still tries to read and exits only if I write again
into /tmp/blabla.
tag 13183 + notabug
close 13183
stop
On 12/14/2012 02:04 PM, Ruediger Meier wrote:
Hi,
I want to use tail and grep to follow a file until a particular pattern
appears. But tail does not exit when grep is finished.
$ echo xxx > /tmp/blabla
$ tail -f /tmp/blabla |grep -m1 --line-buffered "xxx"
x
Hi, whilst using split i stumbled over a typo in the german
command-description from
split --help
ABSCHITTE können sein:
should be
ABSCHNITTE können sein:
Many thanks for the nice program,
Gregor
On 12/14/2012 06:20 AM, Gregor wrote:
> Hi, whilst using split i stumbled over a typo in the german
> command-description from
> split --help
>
> ABSCHITTE können sein:
> should be
> ABSCHNITTE können sein:
Such reports should be sent to the translator; I'm cc'ing the address
mentioned in 'LC_ALL
On 12/14/2012 06:28 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> While running the coreutils testsuite on my oldish Debian desktop with
> a somewhat heavy load and several bleeding-edge tools in PATH, I've
> encountered this failure in the 'tests/misc/timeout-group.sh' test.
>
> [SNIP]
>
I've re-run the test few
On 12/14/2012 10:28 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/14/2012 09:18 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> +case S_MAGIC_CEPH: /* 0x00c36400 remote */
>> + return "ceph";
>
> s/00c/00C/ for consistency
>
> thanks for handling this.
> Pádraig.
Thanks for the review.
Konrad also confirmed that it
On 12/10/2012 08:43 PM, John Reiser wrote:
On 12/10/2012 10:03 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/10/2012 10:06 AM, John Reiser wrote:
Yes, because a count was specified,
dd will operate in its default awkward but POSIX specified mode
of counting each read() call, even if it returned less than specifi
Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
> I think I'll move the warning to count=
> as it's mostly an issue when that is specified.
Good idea.
>> @item of=@var{file}
>> @opindex of
>> @@ -8397,6 +8398,9 @@ may return early if a full block is not available.
>> When that happens, continue calling @code{read
10 matches
Mail list logo
