bug#13030: factor: infinite loop on Linux/powerpc

2012-12-05 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 11/29/2012 08:34 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 11/29/2012 02:28 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > The fix looks good thanks. > I'll commit [...] Now, "make syntax-check" fails: Colin Watson maint.mk: remove the above names from THANKS.in make: *** [sc_THANKS_in_duplicates] Error 1 Before remov

bug#13030: factor: infinite loop on Linux/powerpc

2012-12-05 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:58:11AM +0100, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 11/29/2012 08:34 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > The fix looks good thanks. > > I'll commit [...] > > Now, "make syntax-check" fails: > > Colin Watson > maint.mk: remove the above names from THANKS.in > make: *** [sc_THANKS

bug#13030: factor: infinite loop on Linux/powerpc

2012-12-05 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 12/05/2012 11:08 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:58:11AM +0100, Bernhard Voelker wrote: >> Now, "make syntax-check" fails: >> >> Colin Watson >> maint.mk: remove the above names from THANKS.in >> make: *** [sc_THANKS_in_duplicates] Error 1 >> >> Before removing that en

bug#13080: [PATHC] improve error reporting

2012-12-05 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 12/05/2012 01:57 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: Keying on 0x80 doesn't seem right. I'll apply this hunk instead in your name. Please confirm. diff --git a/src/cut.c b/src/cut.c index 4219d24..f2e63dc 100644 --- a/src/cut.c +++ b/src/cut.c @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv) if (op

bug#13080: [PATHC] improve error reporting

2012-12-05 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 12/05/2012 01:55 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 12/05/2012 01:57 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: Keying on 0x80 doesn't seem right. I'll apply this hunk instead in your name. Please confirm. diff --git a/src/cut.c b/src/cut.c index 4219d24..f2e63dc 100644 --- a/src/cut.c +++ b/src/cut.c @@ -846,7 +84

bug#13089: Wish: split every n'th into n pipes

2012-12-05 Thread Ole Tange
I often have data that can be processed in parallel. It would be great if split --filter could look at every n'th line instead of chunking into n chunks: cat bigfile | split --every-nth -n 8 --filter "grep foo" The above should start 8 greps and give each a line in round robin manner. Ideally

bug#13089: Wish: split every n'th into n pipes

2012-12-05 Thread Pádraig Brady
tag 13089 + notabug close 13089 On 12/05/2012 02:11 PM, Ole Tange wrote: I often have data that can be processed in parallel. It would be great if split --filter could look at every n'th line instead of chunking into n chunks: cat bigfile | split --every-nth -n 8 --filter "grep foo" The ab

bug#13099: possible test bug in "tests/df/total-verify.sh"

2012-12-05 Thread Assaf Gordon
Hello, (properly reporting a bug I mentioned in another email). The test "df/total-verify.sh" fails on my system, due to a wrong(?) regex to verify the output of "df --total -i -P". To make a long story short, my "df" produces the following line: === $ df --total -i -P Filesystem

bug#13099: possible test bug in "tests/df/total-verify.sh"

2012-12-05 Thread Assaf Gordon
Correction: On 12/05/12 22:33, Assaf Gordon wrote: === $ df --total -i -P Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on < snip > //bluearctitan3/foobar0 0 0 - /media/foobar === The filesystem is mounted with fuse/sshfs (not sure if

bug#13098: [PATCH] cut.c: Fix memory leak

2012-12-05 Thread Cojocaru Alexandru
>From 82f2b062c0e21d9a0d64f9ceab363d2a79f5a6eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cojocaru Alexandru Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 03:03:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cut: fix memory leak * src/cut.c (set_fields): don't allocate memory for `printable_field' if there are no finite ranges. The bug was introduced o