On November 21, 2012 at 3:12 AM Paul Eggert wrote:
> I pushed this [...]
This is more of a question, and I may be wrong,
but isn't here still a race afterwards?
execve("src/ginstall", ["src/ginstall", "-g", "video", "-m",
"664", "src/ginstall", "/tmp/g"], ...) = 0
...
stat("src/gi
On 11/21/2012 02:27 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> Why aren't we using fchown and
> fchmod_or_lchmod before the close() call?
The code used to do that, if memory serves, but then
the code was modified to deal with ACLs or SELinux
or whatever and it turned into a big mess, which
I've been afraid to
Differences between 'su' version give different results in the following
shell script:
# !/bin/sh
func() {
su user > /dev/null 2>&1 << EOF
echo >> /tmp/b
EOF
}
if func; then
echo "access"
else
echo "no access"
fi
over fedora 17 I run - coreutils 8.15-8: if the file is not accessible
by
tag 12954 notabug
thanks
On 11/21/2012 09:07 AM, ybronhei wrote:
> Differences between 'su' version give different results in the following
> shell script:
> over fedora 17 I run - coreutils 8.15-8: if the file is not accessible
> by user the script prints no access, and the other way around.
> o
