On 07/04/2012 11:48 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> Wouldn't it then be consequent to remove the long option --megabyte?
Yes, that does make sense.
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> After pulling to the lastest revision (v8.17-37-g74427c7) and
> a successful build (make -j), a subsequent "make syntax-check -j"
> failed:
>
> ...
> 8.47 vulnerable_makefile_CVE-2009-4029
> 8.78 copyright_check
> CC hostname.o
> CCLD arch
> CCLD
On 07/05/2012 12:48 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> I think the general idea is that -k was a mistake, but
>> it's standardized, and that we don't want to have
>> options -m, -g, -t, -p, -e, -z, -y for the other sizes
>> (among other things -t is already taken). -m is there
>> only for BSD compati
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 07/04/2012 09:38 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>> On 07/04/2012 01:11 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>> df -k and df -m both work but only df -k is mentioned as part of df --
>>> help. So, the omission to document -m is IMO a bug.
>>
>> I think the general idea is that -k was a mi
On 07/05/2012 02:35 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> However, I'm tempted to remove it directly this time, since it's been
> undocumented for a while:
>
> 5 years in df.1 and df --help: COREUTILS-6_9-151-g1e07a21
> 11 years in coreutils.texi: FILEUTILS-4_1_4-28-gf5bf6fe
>
> What do you think?
I ag
Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 02:35 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> However, I'm tempted to remove it directly this time, since it's been
>> undocumented for a while:
>>
>> 5 years in df.1 and df --help: COREUTILS-6_9-151-g1e07a21
>> 11 years in coreutils.texi: FILEUTILS-4_1_4-28-gf5bf6fe
According to The International Earth Rotation Service (IERS) we have
"Leap Seconds" included in our UTC time.
Please refer http://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/bulletinc.dat .
~ snip ~
A positive leap second will be introduced at the end of June 2012.
The sequence of dates of the UTC second mar
Hello,
can you please do me a favor and correct the typo in the title?
don't -> doesn't
Thank you for the GNU system!
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Sincerely
i. A. Juergen Heine
juergen.he...@qvs-deutschland.de
QVS GmbH
Lange Laube 18
D-30159 Hannover
http://www.qvs-deutschland.de
Tel: 05
retitle 11866 date doesn't accept 61-sec. minutes
tag moreinfo
thanks
On 07/05/2012 02:15 AM, Juergen Heine wrote:
> A positive leap second will be introduced at the end of June 2012.
> The sequence of dates of the UTC second markers will be:
>
> 2012 June 30, 23h 59m 59s
> 2012 June 30, 23h
On 05/07/12 18:39, Eric Blake wrote:
> retitle 11866 date doesn't accept 61-sec. minutes
thank you for the correction.
> The command 'date' doesn't have any control over whether your system is
> configured to honor or ignore leap seconds. Some systems are
> intentionally configured to ignore lea
On 07/05/2012 01:05 PM, Juergen Heine wrote:
> If i'm correct, can we add this information to the manual for
> people who don't understand the simple line "leap seconds are
> getting ignored"?
Sure, I added the following and am marking this as done.
>From bfda96e0ac5552bb1784f5e1dc311918ce077d50
11 matches
Mail list logo
