bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-duplicates

2011-10-18 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:22:52 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: On 10/17/2011 06:59 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: Thanks for the report. Unfortunately, you did not provide enough information to reproduce this - for example, what platform are you running on? Fairly current Linux -- kernel 3.1-rc9, eg

bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-duplicates

2011-10-18 Thread Jim Meyering
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:22:52 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 10/17/2011 06:59 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: >> Thanks for the report. Unfortunately, you did not provide enough >> information to reproduce this - for example, what platform are you >> running on? >

bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-duplicates

2011-10-18 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 10/18/2011 09:48 AM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:22:52 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 10/17/2011 06:59 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: >> Thanks for the report. Unfortunately, you did not provide enough >> information to reproduce this - for example, what platform a

bug#9762: tac fails when given multiple non-seekable inputs due to misuse of mkstemp()

2011-10-18 Thread Jim Meyering
Ambrose Feinstein wrote: > Thanks for the quick fix! > > Aside from it requiring rearranging other code to not close the fd, > was there a reason not to reuse a single temp file? Actually that's what I started doing, but the change seemed like it'd end up being bigger than I wanted for a bug fix.

bug#9762: tac fails when given multiple non-seekable inputs due to misuse of mkstemp()

2011-10-18 Thread Paul Eggert
On 10/18/11 05:38, Jim Meyering wrote: > * src/tac.c (temp_stream): Don't exit immediately upon failed heap > allocation, here. That would inhibit processing of any additional > command-line arguments. It doesn't matter that much either way here, but in general I'm leery about any attempt to do u

bug#9762: tac fails when given multiple non-seekable inputs due to misuse of mkstemp()

2011-10-18 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert wrote: > On 10/18/11 05:38, Jim Meyering wrote: >> * src/tac.c (temp_stream): Don't exit immediately upon failed heap >> allocation, here. That would inhibit processing of any additional >> command-line arguments. Hi Paul, Perhaps I should add this to the log: ...which may require n

bug#9788: chown gets permission denied

2011-10-18 Thread Richard Woolley
When trying to change ownership of the files in a directory, I mistakenly had the settings wrong in the command, so I got the following ls -l total 16 drw-rw-r-- 4 user proj1 4096 Sep 28 14:23 doc/ drw-rw-r-- 24 user proj1 4096 Sep 28 14:27 modules/ drw-rw-r-- 3 user proj1 4096 Sep 28 14:23 pro

bug#9788: chown gets permission denied

2011-10-18 Thread Alan Curry
Richard Woolley writes: > > When trying to change ownership of the files in a directory, I mistakenly h= > ad the settings wrong in the command, so I got the following > ls -l > total 16 > drw-rw-r-- 4 user proj1 4096 Sep 28 14:23 doc/ > drw-rw-r-- 24 user proj1 4096 Sep 28 14:27 modules/ > drw-

bug#9788: chown gets permission denied

2011-10-18 Thread Richard Woolley
Hi Alan, Thank you! I'd never seen the ?'s before so was stumped. Richard -Original Message- From: Alan Curry [mailto:pacman...@kosh.dhis.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 4:37 PM To: Richard Woolley Cc: 9...@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#9788: chown gets permission denied Rich