I can't believe such an obvious bug would exist this long, but on
the other hand the test is so simple I can't see where it's user
error.
dd, when reading from stdin or from a named pipe sometimes (but
not always) reads a random number of records a bit less then what
it should.
I tried it l
On 04/12/2011 03:02 PM, Jesse Gordon wrote:
> I can't believe such an obvious bug would exist this long, but on the
> other hand the test is so simple I can't see where it's user error.
Thanks for the report. And you are correct in surmising that it is user
error and not a bug in dd.
> dd, when
