jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> The documentation doesn't say that one can also use hex args:
> $ time /bin/sleep 0x10
> real0m16.007s
> However not octal args:
> $ time /bin/sleep 010
> real0m10.003s
Interesting. Thanks for the report.
That's an artifact of GNU sleep using strtod, which mea
Hi Randall,
Randall Lewis wrote:
> Wow! So, a couple comments about how I seem to have figured out
> every wrong way to use "sort" when also using "join."
You did have an impressive number of cases examined!
> Who would've thought that
>
> sort -k1 test1.txt
>
> would default to sort on the en
Thanks Paul.
Yes, it would seem that the true solution to my problem is doing the following
(as you suggested):
use "sort -k 1,1 -t '|'"
This ensures that I sort on the first field--whereas "sort -k1 -t '|'" does
not, as much as I wanted it to. ;) Since I was joining on only the first field
I
On 01/20/2011 11:29 PM, Randall Lewis wrote:
> Also, who would've thought that the default "sort" would be incompatible with
> "join" and that you would need to write the command like this every time you
> wanted to use "join"?
>
> LC_ALL=C sort test1.txt
No, "sort" and "join" use the same coll
On 21/01/11 09:24, Jim Meyering wrote:
> +return false;
> + return ISDIGIT (*p) || *p == '.';
> +}
looks good. Perhaps rename to c_strtod_pre_filter()
as I initially wondered why you hardcoded '.'
cheers,
Pádraig.
Jim Meyering wrote:
> That's an artifact of GNU sleep using strtod, which means "inf" and
> "INFINITY" are also accepted:
>
> $ timeout 1 sleep inf
> [Exit 124]
what's wrong with `sleep inf`?
Have a nice day,
Berny
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 21/01/11 09:24, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> +return false;
>> + return ISDIGIT (*p) || *p == '.';
>> +}
>
> looks good. Perhaps rename to c_strtod_pre_filter()
> as I initially wondered why you hardcoded '.'
Good idea. Done. Thanks for the quick review.
Voelker, Bernhard wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> That's an artifact of GNU sleep using strtod, which means "inf" and
>> "INFINITY" are also accepted:
>>
>> $ timeout 1 sleep inf
>> [Exit 124]
>
> what's wrong with `sleep inf`?
Hi Volker,
There's nothing terribly _wrong_ with it, but I am
You see I was trying to make very special arguments to sleep so that I
can make sure to kill the one I want
pkill -u jidanni -fx sleep\ 22
It is not clear if that will still work. Maybe the man/info page should
say a regexp that matches all valid args.
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> You see I was trying to make very special arguments to sleep so that I
> can make sure to kill the one I want
> pkill -u jidanni -fx sleep\ 22
> It is not clear if that will still work.
With today's change using "sleep 22" will
still act just like "sleep 22
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> You see I was trying to make very special arguments to sleep so that I
> can make sure to kill the one I want
> pkill -u jidanni -fx sleep\ 22
> It is not clear if that will still work. Maybe the man/info page should
> say a regexp that matches all valid args.
On 21/01/11 12:48, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> You see I was trying to make very special arguments to sleep so that I
> can make sure to kill the one I want
> pkill -u jidanni -fx sleep\ 22
> It is not clear if that will still work. Maybe the man/info page should
> say a regexp that matche
On 01/21/2011 06:03 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
>> You see I was trying to make very special arguments to sleep so that I
>> can make sure to kill the one I want
>> pkill -u jidanni -fx sleep\ 22
>> It is not clear if that will still work.
>
> With today's change u
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/21/2011 06:03 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
>>> You see I was trying to make very special arguments to sleep so that I
>>> can make sure to kill the one I want
>>> pkill -u jidanni -fx sleep\ 22
>>> It is not clear if that will still work.
On 01/21/2011 07:57 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Floating point literals include hex-floats, such as 0x1p1. Does today's
>> added pre-filtering to reject 0x1 accidentally also reject hex-float
>> literals? (It's a bit of a shame that when hex-floats were added that
>> strtod() was altered to accept
On 01/21/2011 01:24 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> My first reflex was to make sleep reject args like 0x... and inf.
My reflex was just the opposite: why reject a notation
that might be useful?
Several other programs (printf, seq, sort, tail, plus many
other GNU programs) also use strtod or strtold.
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 01/21/2011 01:24 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> My first reflex was to make sleep reject args like 0x... and inf.
>
> My reflex was just the opposite: why reject a notation
> that might be useful?
I see that at least freebsd's /bin/sleep and the one from sunos 5.11
work just li
On 21/01/11 19:28, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> On 01/21/2011 01:24 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> My first reflex was to make sleep reject args like 0x... and inf.
>>
>> My reflex was just the opposite: why reject a notation
>> that might be useful?
>
> I see that at least freebsd's /
18 matches
Mail list logo
