I'm a bit worried about doing the following in this patch.
It seems to work but I can see ignoring CHLD being
problematic for some shells/situations.
I'll probably push without the test.
--- a/tests/misc/timeout
+++ b/tests/misc/timeout
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ fi
. $srcdir/test-lib.sh
+trap '' CHLD #
The same issue as with the previous `timeout` patch.
The attached includes at test, but I'll probably remove
it because of the previously mentioned concerns.
cheers,
Pádraig.
I'm going with this unless there are objections
>From bb0ae98acca9fe2b27eb5ccadf57d4842cab5d8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?=
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:00:37 +
Subject: [PATCH] tests: fix stty-row-col failure on small fixed terminals
* tests/misc/stty-row-col:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I'm going with this unless there are objections
>
>>From bb0ae98acca9fe2b27eb5ccadf57d4842cab5d8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?utf-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?=
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:00:37 +
> Subject: [PATCH] tests: fix stty-row-col failure on small fixed termi
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The stty & stty-row-col tests fail for me, but I can't figure out why. I
>> wonder whether it's because I'm in a VirtualBox host and it's somehow
>> interfering with the tests? Anyway, I've attached the logs from a
>> verbose run of both
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Thanks for tracking that down!
> Would you please use "!=" in that test
> and $(...) rather than `...` ?
Sure, I was wary because of the mention of sunos in the test.
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> I get a 403 Forbidden error trying to download the latest ss tarballs
> from both meyering.net & people.redhat.com.
Hi Matthew.
Rats. Thanks for the heads up.
I've just fixed the permissions on both.
That was fall-out from my switching a shell to a umask of 077.
My uploa
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> The same issue as with the previous `timeout` patch.
> The attached includes at test, but I'll probably remove
> it because of the previously mentioned concerns.
really attached this time. sorry
>From 33904143eab537385ce1af58ea15c1876da402c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Thanks for tracking that down!
>> Would you please use "!=" in that test
>> and $(...) rather than `...` ?
>
> Sure, I was wary because of the mention of sunos in the test.
The configure-time test for a posix shell should cover us in the tests,
since e
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I'm a bit worried about doing the following in this patch.
> It seems to work but I can see ignoring CHLD being
> problematic for some shells/situations.
> I'll probably push without the test.
Oh it looks like tests/install/trap already addresses
the portability concerns I w
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> I'm a bit worried about doing the following in this patch.
>> It seems to work but I can see ignoring CHLD being
>> problematic for some shells/situations.
>> I'll probably push without the test.
>
> Oh it looks like tests/install/trap already addresse
Gentlemen, I object. The messages for these two commands should be different.
$ cp -v f g
`f' -> `g'
$ mv -v f g
`f' -> `g'
Exactly how different etc. I leave up to you. Maybe even just => for the
latter instead of ->.
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Gentlemen, I object. The messages for these two commands should be different.
> $ cp -v f g
> `f' -> `g'
> $ mv -v f g
> `f' -> `g'
> Exactly how different etc. I leave up to you. Maybe even just => for the
> latter instead of ->.
I think it's fine from the context as
Jim Meyering wrote:
> FYI, I should be pushing these soon, and then making a snapshot
> within a couple hours:
>
> [PATCH 1/2] build: distcheck: do not leave a $TMPDIR/coreutils directory
> behind
aka, http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/commit/?id=ae034822c535fa5
Now that there's a p
Hi Pádraig,
* Pádraig Brady wrote on Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 02:00:20AM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > for some time now, 'make check' in the git coreutils tree hangs for me:
[...]
> I think it may be a gdb issue:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-12/msg00025.htm
> For the mom
This should be the final snapshot before coreutils-8.2,
due tomorrow or Thursday.
coreutils snapshot: (.gz files are here, too)
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.xz 4.3 MB
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.xz.sig
http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-8.1.30-0f8bb.tar.xz
There ar
Ralf Wildenhues writes:
>
> Hi Pádraig,
>
> * Pádraig Brady wrote on Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 02:00:20AM CET:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > for some time now, 'make check' in the git coreutils tree hangs for me:
> [...]
> > I think it may be a gdb issue:
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-c
Passed Skipped Failed
\-
Fedora core 5 x86 | 363 48 0
Fedora 11 x86 | 362 49 0
Solaris 10 x86| 342 69 0
FreeBSD 6 x86 | 338
$ touch - && echo ok
ok
$ ls -
ls: cannot access -: No such file or directory
$ touch -- - && echo ok
ok
$ ls -
ls: cannot access -: No such file or directory
$ : > -
$ ls -
-
> $ touch - && echo ok
> ok
Not a bug - you successfully touched stdout (in this case,
your terminal). Remember, many commands special case - to
mean stdin or stdout if they operate well on a single file.
>
> $ ls -
> ls: cannot access -: No such file or directory
ls is not one of those comman
20 matches
Mail list logo
