PS> Otherwise I'd like to hear the submitters opinion as well.
The submitter leaves it all in your hands as I am not as sharp as I
used to be. Thanks.
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreut
Hi again,
Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:09:09PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> If you're serious about it, and can sign a copyright assignment,
>> please look through the coreutils contribution/style guidelines
>> http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitw
Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ehh.. forgotten to write about this one:
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:09:09PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> - demonstrate --check --pedantic failing due to invalid first line
>> (ensure it still processes following ones -- should it warn
JM> It should process every line.
JM> My question was whether to emit a diagnostic for each _malformed_ line,
JM> or just for the first or maybe the first few.
Like cmp(1) bail out if any trouble perhaps, but have options for fuller
digging/reports. OK, never mind... I leave it in your hands.
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> JM> It should process every line.
> JM> My question was whether to emit a diagnostic for each _malformed_ line,
> JM> or just for the first or maybe the first few.
>
> Like cmp(1) bail out if any trouble perhaps, but have options for fuller
> digging/reports. OK, never m
Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> > I was a bit sceptic about this copyright assignment and wondered why the
>> > HACKING file does not include any link to [1]. Just as a suggestion
>>
>> What's [1] ?
>
> sorry, accidentally removed the link:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-a
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:25:09AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Good idea.
> I've just added that link to HACKING.
Great :-)
> > Makes sense. But this isn't a strong requirement is it? I don't even
> > have access to all this operating systems ;)
>
> With google, there's no need for access to t
Hi Jim,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:09:09PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> If you're serious about it, and can sign a copyright assignment,
> please look through the coreutils contribution/style guidelines
> http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=blob;f=HACKING;hb=HEAD
> and make the follo
Hi,
ehh.. forgotten to write about this one:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:09:09PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> - demonstrate --check --pedantic failing due to invalid first line
> (ensure it still processes following ones -- should it warn
> about each? or just the first?)
I do
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:34:02AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:09:09PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> If you're serious about it, and can sign a copyright assignment,
> >> please look
>From 156d7e829da3ab9d895a275c2cd02e52388bcd0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:54:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] md5sum: Implemented --pedantic option to be more strict in
verification mode
* md5sum: Implemented a --pedantic option in --c
11 matches
Mail list logo
