Re: making GNU ls -i (--inode) work around the linux readdir bug

2008-07-10 Thread Phillip Susi
Jim Meyering wrote: From what I've read, POSIX does not specify this. If you know of wording that is more precise, please post a quote. That was my point the standard does not specify that this behavior is an error, and since every unix system since the dawn of time has behaved this way,

Re: making GNU ls -i (--inode) work around the linux readdir bug

2008-07-10 Thread Phillip Susi
Wayne Pollock wrote: How can either ls or readdir be considered correct when the output is so inconsistent? What behavior do you expect from backup scripts (and similar tools) that use find (or readdir)? It seems clear to me that returning the underlying inode numbers must result in having the w