Re: should GNU install call matchpathcon by default?

Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes: > In the multi-file case, the pre-patch performance penalty for enabling > the ifdef'd-out code would range from probably-immeasurable (for just > 2 or 3 files) to infinite, with enough files to make install exhaust > virtual memory. Actually even for 2-3 files

Re: bug report : about rm command

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [re-adding the list] According to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 5/20/2008 10:18 PM: | U:\>rm --version | rm (coreutils) 5.2.1 Thanks. This version is several years old, and typically means you downloaded rm as part of a poorly-maintained port. I would sugge

Re: bug report : about rm command

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:14:55AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for you rapid response. > > My rm command use background: > I use it in a cpy.bat file , which is invoked by VC++ 6.0 post build > command.(per build , dll and pde file will be copy to a special directory, > but the orig

Re: bug report : about rm command

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:14:55AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for you rapid response. > > My rm command use background: > I use it in a cpy.bat file , which is invoked by VC++ 6.0 post build > command.(per build , dll and pde file will be copy to a special directory, > but the orig

Is this bug in who?

$ who am i? spsaspts/5May 21 07:52 (10.0.71.131) $ who am i spsaspts/5May 21 07:52 (10.0.71.131) $ who y

Re: Is this bug in who?

I assume you are surprised by the result for "who abcd abcd", but I think that just means you didn't read the documentation yet. If you are trying to report a bug could you explain what you think is wrong? James. ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-

Re: Is this bug in who?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Subash Patel on 5/21/2008 5:51 AM: | $ who abcd abcd | spsaspts/5May 21 07:52 (10.0.71.131) | | I thought this should be a minor bug, although not critical. And what ex

RE: Is this bug in who?

James, I appreciate your prompt reply. I am pasting the cut section from "info coreutils who" - If given two non-option arguments, `who' prints only the entry for the user running it (determined from its standard input), preceded by the hostname. Traditionally,

Re: Is this bug in who?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Subash Patel on 5/21/2008 6:51 AM: | Although I have been using this command for a long time, | I never gave a thought to try something like today, which happened by a | typo. As per this document, "am I" is considered as ar

RE: Is this bug in who?

Eric, Thanks for that reply. I have cc'ed your group and expect you got my reply to James. The same reply holds good here as well. Thanks, Subash -Original Message- From: Eric Blake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 6:09 PM To: Subas

Re: should GNU install call matchpathcon by default?

Ondrej Vasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes: >> In the multi-file case, the pre-patch performance penalty for enabling >> the ifdef'd-out code would range from probably-immeasurable (for just >> 2 or 3 files) to infinite, with enough files to make install exhaust >>

Re: should GNU install call matchpathcon by default?

On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 16:26 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Ondrej Vasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes: > >> In the multi-file case, the pre-patch performance penalty for enabling > >> the ifdef'd-out code would range from probably-immeasurable (for just > >> 2 or

Re: Is this bug in who?

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Subash Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James, >I appreciate your prompt reply. I am > pasting the cut section from "info coreutils who" > - > If given two non-option arguments, `who' prints only the entry for > the user running

I think sort has a bug

Hi, I think I found a bug of sort. the command is echo -e "a0 1\na 1\na1 1" | sort The result is a0 1 a 1 a1 1 Is this wrong? Best, Manhong Dai ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mai

Re: I think sort has a bug

Dai, Manhong wrote: > I think I found a bug of sort. the command is > > echo -e "a0 1\na 1\na1 1" | sort > a0 1 > a 1 > a1 1 > > Is this wrong? The result is dependent upon your configured locale. The above is correct in a locale that ignores punctuation such as en_US. Please see