Re: [PATCH] Implement join --check-order and --nocheck-order.

2008-03-23 Thread Jim Meyering
"Dmitry V. Levin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: >> James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > This is a consolidated patch including all the previous changes, >> > implementing order checking in join by default. "make distcheck" >> >

Re: configure fails on Maemo/OS2008 (sed: no previous regexp)

2008-03-23 Thread Jim Meyering
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-03-22 19:20:37 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: >> This appears to be a busybox "limitation". >> I expect to work around it with this patch: ... > Thanks, I could build the coreutils on the N810. Thanks for the quick confirmation. I pushed that change

Re: [PATCH] Implement join --check-order and --nocheck-order.

2008-03-23 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > diff --git a/src/join.c b/src/join.c > index 8f0d436..aaf66b0 100644 > --- a/src/join.c > +++ b/src/join.c ... > @@ -404,6 +406,7 @@ get_line (FILE *fp, struct line *line, int which) > error (EXIT_FAILURE, errno, _("read error")); >free (l

seq bug -- out of bounds read (off by one)

2008-03-23 Thread Daniel Dunbar
Hi Jim, Thanks for the quick reply on the ptx bug. We have found another minor bug (non-crashing) in seq. An example problem input is: -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:src$ ./seq -f %0 1 ./seq: memory exhausted -- The problem is in seq.c:213 (in 6.10 source), if (! strchr ("efgaEFGA", fmt[i]