Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>
>Using strcoll is inefficient anyway
Don't we know it! If we can avoid it, we'd like to.
>>>
>>>Well, the mbstowcs+wcscoll solution I presented
>>>should be equivalent to strcoll on any platform,
>>>and it's much faster in my tests.
>>
>>
>
Why isn't the command to exit tail in the man page?
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
Problem:
The check with md5sum failed (No such file or directory/FAILED open or read) if
the text file with the checksum included DOS(PC) formatted.
I am new to LINUX and I use md5sum version 5.94 with the knoppix live cd.
I don't know if this is a real bug, but I think that this program should c
Neil Adair wrote:
> Why isn't the command to exit tail in the man page?
tail is not an interactive program and
so will not parse commands you enter.
It is known as a filter and just reads stdin and
writes to stdout.
So if you just type `tail`, it will block
reading from stdin which will be connec
Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> if (isatty(stdin) && isatty(sterr)) {
> fprintf(stderr,"Hit Ctrl-d to end\n");
> }
>
> Can anyone think of non human interactions
> between tail and terminals where the above
> wouldn't be appropriate?
Sure: "tail -f /dev/tty". Let's not make this
Thanks for the response but I left out the -f
ie. there is no documentation of how to exit tail -f
I now know it's ctrl c
Neil
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Neil Adair wrote:
Why isn't the command to exit tail in the man page?
tail is not an interactive program and
so will not parse com
Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There seems to be serious overhead with strcoll on glibc-2.3.5-10 at least.
We can fix the performance problem for that particular test case as
follows. I installed this (diff -pubw format):
2006-08-14 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* memc
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>There seems to be serious overhead with strcoll on glibc-2.3.5-10 at least.
>
>
> We can fix the performance problem for that particular test case as
> follows. I installed this (diff -pubw format):
>
> 2006-08-14 Paul Egge
