Re: rate limit in copy.c

2006-06-18 Thread maurizio panniello
Hi Bob, thanks for your answer, --- Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > It looks like your mailer sent out two identical > copies of your > message. I see that you are subscribed so I won't > CC you. Yes, my fault, sorry. > > Are you familiar with rsync? It is installed by > default

Re: ia64 GNU/Linux pwd-long test failure in CVS coreutils

2006-06-18 Thread Jim Meyering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > Trying to build today's CVS version of coreutils on an ia64 machine > running Debian GNU/Linux Sarge/stable I get the following assertion > failure from pwd-long. This is using Debian's stock stable release of > glibc 2.3.2 and gcc 3.3.5 running a linux 2.6.

Failed: phase compiling: coreutils-5.96-1 failed

2006-06-18 Thread François Giron
Thank's for your fast respons. I submit it to the fink project developers (Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net). I transmit to you the results of tests: % make -C tests/chgrp TESTS=basic make: Nothing to be done for `all'. % source script-utils.sh PATH=/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/opt/local/bin:/Developer/T

FYI: ftruncate tests are on the way out, maybe

2006-06-18 Thread Jim Meyering
Since ftruncate has been used unconditionally in shred since 1999, this seems like a safe bet. I suspect it'll eventually be ok to remove the SysV-ish lib/ftruncate.c, as well. I've just made this change in coreutils (trunk, not branch): 2006-06-18 Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * f

Affordable medicine directly from manufacturer

2006-06-18 Thread Jana
Zy7bOnYJ29YelpHtfHRzPXOb4RrlODDrq3sC8oPRTZIL3vovPgFf1EMRoRnJKAxDTWaTlC2itj33 r83Prc7AN6kunTrx4naIz1FJpBNUv0RWAvUhuEpYOw0mTNeCt5FXrLJwHx9ijmIbfgCaRv4ANWPtIO7 djomFcE1DjgBzxH8YIC4QOuG4HpOqQYqSE6pL7NaLzpJP3gGNFGQCEPnYac25HyGTSlRm1 iSov10YhysFoIqvFSwOiqk

fix a nit in getcwd-path-max.m4

2006-06-18 Thread Jim Meyering
There was a bug in the cleanup code for gl_FUNC_GETCWD_PATH_MAX. But it doesn't really matter, since it's probably never been triggered, and the driving shell script also removes the hierarchy. This would matter only if a preceding mkdir succeeded, but the immediately following chdir-into-new-dire

Re: ia64 GNU/Linux pwd-long test failure in CVS coreutils

2006-06-18 Thread Bob Proulx
Hi Jim, Jim Meyering wrote: > Bob, would you please compile and run this and tell me what > it does on your ia64 system? Done. It "works". > I expect it to abort and leave behind the deep tree. > If that's what it does, then I'll change all exit calls to > always exit 0, and just let the abort

Re: ia64 GNU/Linux pwd-long test failure in CVS coreutils

2006-06-18 Thread Jim Meyering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > Done. It "works". Thanks for the quick test. >> I expect it to abort and leave behind the deep tree. >> If that's what it does, then I'll change all exit calls to >> always exit 0, and just let the abort trigger the test failure. > > Nope. Sitting in /tmp

Re: Failed: phase compiling: coreutils-5.96-1 failed

2006-06-18 Thread Bob Proulx
François Giron wrote: > I transmit to you the results of tests: > > % make -C tests/chgrp TESTS=basic > make: Nothing to be done for `all'. Unfortunately the instructions given to you were missing a "check" target there. That command build the default target instead. Please add the check taret

Re: ia64 GNU/Linux pwd-long test failure in CVS coreutils

2006-06-18 Thread Bob Proulx
Jim Meyering wrote: > I should have created a directory whose abs. name length > is a little *larger* than 16K, not just smaller. > > Does it provoke the failed assertion if you change this line > > size_t buf_len = 16 * 1024; > > to e.g., this: > > size_t buf_len = 20 * 1024; Yes. At 20k

Re: ia64 GNU/Linux pwd-long test failure in CVS coreutils

2006-06-18 Thread Jim Meyering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> I should have created a directory whose abs. name length >> is a little *larger* than 16K, not just smaller. >> >> Does it provoke the failed assertion if you change this line >> >> size_t buf_len = 16 * 1024; >> >> to e.g., this: >>

Re: ia64 GNU/Linux pwd-long test failure in CVS coreutils

2006-06-18 Thread Bob Proulx
Jim Meyering wrote: > Would you please try one more time? Sure. Here are the results. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/rwp$ ls -log total 36 -rwxr-xr-x 1 28651 Jun 18 13:03 getcwd-glibc-bug* -rw-r--r-- 1 1087 Jun 18 13:02 getcwd-glibc-bug.c [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/rwp$ ./getcwd-glibc-bug ; ech

Re: ia64 GNU/Linux pwd-long test failure in CVS coreutils

2006-06-18 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: >> Jim Meyering wrote: >>> I should have created a directory whose abs. name length >>> is a little *larger* than 16K, not just smaller. >>> >>> Does it provoke the failed assertion if you change this line >>> >>> si

Re: ia64 GNU/Linux pwd-long test failure in CVS coreutils

2006-06-18 Thread Jim Meyering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: ... > One thing that I am a little worried about by the test is the initial > mkdir call. > > if (mkdir (dir_name, S_IRWXU) < 0 || chdir (dir_name) < 0) > { > fail = 3; /* Unable to construct deep hierarchy. */ > > That also fails if re

Re: Failed: phase compiling: coreutils-5.96-1 failed

2006-06-18 Thread François Giron
Le 18 juin 06 à 19:33, Bob Proulx a écrit : François Giron wrote: I transmit to you the results of tests: % make -C tests/chgrp TESTS=basic make: Nothing to be done for `all'. Unfortunately the instructions given to you were missing a "check" target there. That command build the default ta

Re: Failed: phase compiling: coreutils-5.96-1 failed

2006-06-18 Thread Jim Meyering
François Giron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 18 juin 06 à 19:33, Bob Proulx a écrit : > >> François Giron wrote: >>> I transmit to you the results of tests: >>> >>> % make -C tests/chgrp TESTS=basic >>> make: Nothing to be done for `all'. >> >> Unfortunately the instructions given to you were mi

Re: Failed: phase compiling: coreutils-5.96-1 failed

2006-06-18 Thread François Giron
Le 18 juin 06 à 22:13, Jim Meyering a écrit : François Giron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le 18 juin 06 à 19:33, Bob Proulx a écrit : François Giron wrote: I transmit to you the results of tests: % make -C tests/chgrp TESTS=basic make: Nothing to be done for `all'. Unfortunately the instr

Re: ia64 GNU/Linux pwd-long test failure in CVS coreutils

2006-06-18 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > ... >> One thing that I am a little worried about by the test is the initial >> mkdir call. >> >> if (mkdir (dir_name, S_IRWXU) < 0 || chdir (dir_name) < 0) >> { >> fail = 3; /* Unable to const

verbose mode of RM

2006-06-18 Thread Alex Lanstein
Hi guys, I don't know if this is a bug or not, more of an annoyance really. When one does a verbose 'rm', ie, 'rm -fv *.zip' they'll see this output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- {/var/www/html/music} rm -rvf *.zip removed `1147309099.zip' removed `1147312167.zip' removed `1147317696.zip' removed `1

Re: verbose mode of RM

2006-06-18 Thread Eric Blake
> I don't know if this is a bug or not, more of an annoyance really. When > one does a verbose 'rm', ie, 'rm -fv *.zip' they'll see this output: This is intentional. If you were to use a console that displayed unicode, and a locale that supports unicode encodings, then you would see better quot