Jim Meyering wrote:
>Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>
>
>>Still, maybe not all programs have similar rate-limiting features, so
>>that this nice-extension may be useful anyway...
>>
>>
>
>I agree. Maybe even as a separate program, for when you start something
>important and
Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I argued to hide all that in the kernel 3 years ago
> so a seperate interface was not needed:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/11/10/64
I agree.
It would certainly be better from a user-interface standpoint
to be able to tell the system that a process has prio
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a few outstanding posts with patches:
Thanks for summarizing them.
They are indeed in the queue.
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> > Still, maybe not all programs have similar rate-limiting features, so
> > that this nice-extension may be useful anyway...
>
> I agree. Maybe even as a separate program, for when you start something
> important and somehow
