On 09/29/2014 02:47 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> tag 18585 notabug
> thanks
>
> On 09/29/2014 07:25 AM, Schapovalov, Sebastian wrote:
>> Hello, I was testing one parameter in my .sh and realised that the wc
>> command return a different value that I was expected. I send y
tag 18585 notabug
thanks
On 09/29/2014 07:25 AM, Schapovalov, Sebastian wrote:
> Hello, I was testing one parameter in my .sh and realised that the wc command
> return a different value that I was expected. I send you a couple examples.
>
> I have to validate a celular telephon
Hello, I was testing one parameter in my .sh and realised that the wc command
return a different value that I was expected. I send you a couple examples.
I have to validate a celular telephone number (in Argentina), so, it has to be
a 10 chars parameter.
sarasa() -- seba > echo 1029384
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 12/22/2008 10:57 AM:
>>> It would be possible to add a conditional check, where if POSIXLY_CORRECT
>>> is not defined in the environment and a filter app is started with a tty
>>> as stdin and stderr (ie. the same criteria
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> According to Andrew McGill on 12/22/2008 1:38 AM:
>>> My guess is that while it would be friendly to provide a similar message for
>>> wc (od, head, tail, etc), it would violate something posixy (and is
>>> therefore
>>> imposixable).
>>
>> It would be
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Andrew McGill on 12/22/2008 1:38 AM:
>> My guess is that while it would be friendly to provide a similar message for
>> wc (od, head, tail, etc), it would violate something posixy (and is
>> therefore
>> imposixable).
>
> It would be possible to add a conditiona
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Andrew McGill on 12/22/2008 1:38 AM:
> My guess is that while it would be friendly to provide a similar message for
> wc (od, head, tail, etc), it would violate something posixy (and is therefore
> imposixable).
It would be possible to
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 15:07:43 Pádraig Brady wrote:
> chakrapani.chittabathina wrote:
> > Hi,
> > First, we are grateful to you for your contribution towards this great
> > open source project.
> > Bug : when i am using "wc" command, i've enter
chakrapani.chittabathina wrote:
> Hi,
> First, we are grateful to you for your contribution towards this great
> open source project.
> Bug : when i am using "wc" command, i've entered only wc without any
> option and file name even, acidently, then it didn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to chakrapani.chittabathina on 12/17/2008 1:06 AM:
Hello Chakrapani,
> Bug : when i am using "wc" command, i've entered only wc without any
> option and file name even, acidently, then it didn't give any error
Hi,
First, we are grateful to you for your contribution towards this
great open source project.
Bug : when i am using "wc" command, i've entered only wc without any
option and file name even, acidently, then it didn't give any error
report, even not giving help info.
Saifullah QAZI wrote:
>
>
>Hi, using cygwin, 'wc' count is alway one less than actual lines in file= .
>Is that defect or designed.?
>
The wc program counts newline characters (0x0a) in the file.
info coreutils wc
`wc' counts the number of bytes, characters, whitespace-sep
Hi, using cygwin, 'wc' count is alway one less than actual lines in file= .
Is that defect or designed.?
thanks
Saifullah Qazi
Test Consultant
SoftTest Labs
Tel: +1(778) 855-1106
http://www.softtestlabs.com
___
"Sebastian, Susan M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The man pages says the wc command will
> "wc - print the number of bytes, words, and lines in files",
Thanks, but this doesn't seem to be in the latest coreutils CVS;
perhaps you're talki
The man pages says the wc command will
"wc - print the number of bytes, words, and lines in files", but the actual
output from the command is in he order of line, word, byte.
Susan Sebastian
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gn
15 matches
Mail list logo
