ot;multiple files" - it doesn;t expand the wildcard.
> Was this functionality intentionally left out of the test binary for
> SuSe Linux?
As per Brian's earlier response, you are probably not using the test
binary at all in any case.
> Why would there be a difference of obs
Questions about the test binary on SuSe Linux for os/390:
We are seeing on AIX and HPUX that the 'test -e' does not complain when it
finds multiple files in a given directory. Was this functionality
intentionally left out of the test binary for SuSe Linux?
Why would there be a dif
Brian answered your question but did not CC you on the reply so I
doubt you saw the followup. Therefore I am forwarding it to you.
Bob
Brian Dessent wrote:
> Kenneth J Vojtech wrote:
>
> > In zLinux for o/s390 (SuSe v 8 64 bit) is a binary 'test' that we use to
> > test for the existence of fil
Subject: Re: test binary
07/22/2005 10:50
AM
Kenneth J Vojtech wrote:
> In zLinux for o/s390 (SuSe v 8 64 bit) is a binary 'test' that we use to
> test for the existence of files. One of our tests uses a wildcard to check
You are probably using the bash builtin command 'test' here and not the
binary /bin/test that is a part of coreutils.
In zLinux for o/s390 (SuSe v 8 64 bit) is a binary 'test' that we use to
test for the existence of files. One of our tests uses a wildcard to check
for any *.hdr files in a certain directory. When there is more than one
*.hdr file in this directory, the test fails with an exit 2, so we are no
