Le Sun, 09 Nov 2003 10:27:45 +0100, Jim Meyering disait :
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> Have you read the GNU Coding Standards document?
No, not yet, but this mistake will soon be patched :)
> Run `info standards' on a Linux system. There are
> some minor syntactic problems below. Most wou
Olivier Delhomme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[25 lines of unnecessary context removed -- please trim context of
quoted messages]
> Thank you for replying so quickly,
> sorry for that mistake, i'm so confused. Here is the patch
> against today's cvs sources :
Thank you for the patch.
Have you
Le Sat, 08 Nov 2003 09:50:13 +0100, Jim Meyering disait :
> Olivier Delhomme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I send a patch on november 2 and i was wondering if
> > it was sent directly to /dev/null ?
>
> You sent it to the right place.
> But sometimes it takes a long time for me to handle feature
Olivier Delhomme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I send a patch on november 2 and i was wondering if
> it was sent directly to /dev/null ?
You sent it to the right place.
But sometimes it takes a long time for me to handle feature additions.
> Please let me know, where i am wrong with this patch
> a
Hello,
I send a patch on november 2 and i was wondering if
it was sent directly to /dev/null ?
Please let me know, where i am wrong with this patch
as it adds a feature requested in the TODO list :
dd: consider adding an option to suppress `bytes/block read/written'
output to stderr. Suggest
