Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That looks fine to me.
OK, I installed it into gnulib.
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about the following patch instead? It seems a bit more
> straightforward. However, I don't fully understand the problem so I
> may well have gotten it wrong.
>
> 2006-12-11 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * m4/openat.m4 (gl_FUNC_OPENAT): Do
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please take a look at thread:
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/2006-December/018341.html
>
> The problem is that coreutils uses own internal copies
> of openat() and fchmodat() even if glibc already provides
> these func
Please take a look at thread:
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/2006-December/018341.html
The problem is that coreutils uses own internal copies
of openat() and fchmodat() even if glibc already provides
these functions (starting from glibc 2.4).
Simplest patch:
diff -urN
