On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:38 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Thanks.
> Those "failures" show merely that you built with profiling
> in such a way that every binary drops a gmon.out file in the
> current directory. Then, any test that expects certain files
> to be present finds an anomaly: the unexpect
HggdH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 16:37 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> > I have run the tests both as root and as a normal user. I have
>> failures
>> > on both runs.
>> >
>> > I ran the tests as 'make tests', which I *think* was what was
>> required.
>>
>> Thanks for testing.
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 16:37 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > I have run the tests both as root and as a normal user. I have
> failures
> > on both runs.
> >
> > I ran the tests as 'make tests', which I *think* was what was
> required.
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
> > Do you want the failures?
>
> O
HggdH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have run the tests both as root and as a normal user. I have failures
> on both runs.
>
> I ran the tests as 'make tests', which I *think* was what was required.
Thanks for testing.
> Do you want the failures?
Of course ;-) This is the place.
_
I have run the tests both as root and as a normal user. I have failures
on both runs.
I ran the tests as 'make tests', which I *think* was what was required.
Do you want the failures?
Linux AMD64 Ubuntu Intrepid (8.10) post-beta.
Regards,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
