On 6/13/07, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vin Shelton wrote:
> James Youngman wrote:
> > If you rebuild with ICC, does the problem persist?
>
> Yes.
It will be interesting to see what is happening there.
> > If so, could you try the things that Jim and Bob suggested?
> > Specifically, s
Vin Shelton wrote:
> James Youngman wrote:
> > If you rebuild with ICC, does the problem persist?
>
> Yes.
It will be interesting to see what is happening there.
> > If so, could you try the things that Jim and Bob suggested?
> > Specifically, sending us the config.log files and trying
> > "conf
On 6/13/07, James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/13/07, Vin Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/12/07, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If, after the above, you still see the problem, please save a copy of
> > your config.log file (evidence! to send here). Then you ca
On 6/13/07, Vin Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/12/07, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If, after the above, you still see the problem, please save a copy of
> your config.log file (evidence! to send here). Then you can probably
> work around it by rebuilding with ./configure
On 6/12/07, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
...
> I can't recreate that. First I tried the current version control head
> and it worked fine with your test case. So I pulled the prior 6.8
> bundle and compiled it.
>
> $ wget ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gn
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That will ensure that you use the regex code bundled with coreutils,
> which may be less buggy than what's in your systems C library.
In the meantime it shouldn't hurt to test for the buggy regexp he
mentioned. I installed this into gnulib:
2007-06-12
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
...
> I can't recreate that. First I tried the current version control head
> and it worked fine with your test case. So I pulled the prior 6.8
> bundle and compiled it.
>
> $ wget ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-6.8.tar.bz2
> $ tar xjf coreut
Vin Shelton wrote:
> I believe I found a bug (or at least a change) in the behavior of expr
> in coreutils-6.8.
Thank you for the report. However I can't recreate the problem you
describe using coreutils-6.8. Was this coreutils that you compiled
yourself? If so on what operating system?
I am a
Greetings,
I believe I found a bug (or at least a change) in the behavior of expr
in coreutils-6.8.
Formerly this command:
expr 20x11-common_process-args : '[[:alnum:]_-]\+$'
returned the value 25. As of coreutils-6.8, that command returns an
error:
/opt/bin/expr-broken 20x11-common_process-a
