Wendy Palm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> with the change i proposed, the only error i have with the tests is
> date-tests and i haven't had time to check what that problem is yet.
I doubt whether the tests exercise the md5 and sha code a lot, and I
suspect that there will be latent bugs, unless s
Paul Eggert wrote:
Wendy Palm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
! #if UINT_MAX == _UINT_MAX_64
! typedef unsigned int md5_uint32;
! #else
! /* The following line is intended to evoke an error.
! Using #error is not portable enough. */
! "Cannot determine unsigned 32
Wendy Palm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ! #if UINT_MAX == _UINT_MAX_64
> ! typedef unsigned int md5_uint32;
> ! #else
> ! /* The following line is intended to evoke an error.
> ! Using #error is not portable enough. */
> ! "Cannot determine unsigned 32-bit data
i've run into a few problems while testing coreutils-5.0.90 and 5.0.1 on the Crays.
please consider these small patches:
lib/md5.h and src/shred.c need additions to account for the cray's wordsize
old crays have the return value int for endusershell and setusershell (incorrect,
i know, but nothin
