On 08/04/2025 11:22, Bruno Haible wrote:
Paul Eggert wrote:
I don't see the problem on cfarm220.cfarm.net with the current coreutils
That's because you are not on the /dev/wd0a disk on that machine.
What I see by single-stepping through "ls -Z ." in gdb is:
1. f->scontext gets set to "?".
2.
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I don't see the problem on cfarm220.cfarm.net with the current coreutils
That's because you are not on the /dev/wd0a disk on that machine.
What I see by single-stepping through "ls -Z ." in gdb is:
1. f->scontext gets set to "?".
2. Upon the first entry to function file_has_a
On 2025-04-07 16:06, Pádraig Brady wrote:
I have access to cfarm220.cfarm.net,
so I'll look at this tomorrow.
I don't see the problem on cfarm220.cfarm.net with the current coreutils
commit (42f6201aa554fde4c78a3c5d0207d85392eb742e), using "./configure &&
make -j5 check" . The command "src/ls
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I'll also apply this logic to has_capability_cache().
Yes, the same mistake is lurking there as well.
Bruno
On 07/04/2025 23:41, Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils Bug Reports wrote:
On OpenBSD 7.6 there is a test failure:
FAIL: tests/ls/selinux-segfault
Find attached the log file.
To reproduce the issue, just run
$ src/ls -Z .
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
It crashes at strlen(), due to a NULL arg
On OpenBSD 7.6 there is a test failure:
FAIL: tests/ls/selinux-segfault
Find attached the log file.
To reproduce the issue, just run
$ src/ls -Z .
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
It crashes at strlen(), due to a NULL argument,
invoked from gobble_file (name = ".", type = arg_directory, inode
