On Fri, 23 May 2014 at 15:02, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 23 May 2014 13:12, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
>> tl;dr
>>
>> You can get what you want currently by doing:
>>
>> du() { env du -B1 "$@" | numfmt --to=iec-i --suffix=B; }
>>
>
> Thanks very much, that's certainly good enough for me.
>
Tod
On 23 May 2014 13:12, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> tl;dr
>
> You can get what you want currently by doing:
>
> du() { env du -B1 "$@" | numfmt --to=iec-i --suffix=B; }
>
Thanks very much, that's certainly good enough for me.
My understanding of the rest of what you wrote is that fixing the
inco
tl;dr
You can get what you want currently by doing:
du() { env du -B1 "$@" | numfmt --to=iec-i --suffix=B; }
Though there are some potential changes.
I'm 60:40 against applying the attached block-size-iec-iB.patch
I'm 60:40 for applying the attached block-size-help-iB.patch
details
On 22 May 2014 23:58, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 05/22/2014 08:47 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> > It would be helpful to this addle-pated individual if du would output the
> > same units as it accepts as SIZE inputs, so that one could more readily
> > tell whether one was getting 1000-based or 1024-b
On 05/22/2014 08:47 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> It would be helpful to this addle-pated individual if du would output the
> same units as it accepts as SIZE inputs, so that one could more readily
> tell whether one was getting 1000-based or 1024-based units.
>
> For additional clarity, it would hel
It would be helpful to this addle-pated individual if du would output the
same units as it accepts as SIZE inputs, so that one could more readily
tell whether one was getting 1000-based or 1024-based units.
For additional clarity, it would help if for output the suffix were "B" as
at present for 1
