Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 07/12/2012 02:27 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I didn't really understand the cause
>
> That one is one of my least favorite warnings
> because sometimes it warns about real bugs but
> often, as in your case, the warning is either
> bogus or so hard to figure out that it might
On 07/12/2012 02:27 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I didn't really understand the cause
That one is one of my least favorite warnings
because sometimes it warns about real bugs but
often, as in your case, the warning is either
bogus or so hard to figure out that it might as
well be bogus. I see that y
[mostly for the record, and so I don't forget.
I'm not ready to push this just yet. ]
Building shred with fedora 17 and its stock gcc 4.7 on i686,
I see this warning/error:
CC shred.o
shred.c: In function 'dopass':
shred.c:501:14: error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when
