On Jan 28, 2008 12:45 AM, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For all distros perhaps being more aggressive at forwarding downstream
> bugs to the upstream mailing list would be a good thing. I know that
> I have not been doing that as much as I should.
I could not agree more. I often find
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
> > Meanwhile, would it be worth subscribing bug-coreutils to the debian bug
> > feed list? That way, this list would see bugs as they are reported, and
> > others besides Jim will be able to chime in with advice.
>
> I know Bob Proulx is already subscribed
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that Jim just committed a patch based on a bug originally
> reported through the debian tracker without any additional mention here:
>
> http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=c0c8685
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 07:23:08PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
I know Bob Proulx is already subscribed there.
Some of the traffic would not be interesting, i.e., a message
announcing that a bug is closed, or tagged -- but those are easy to skip.
Overall, I think it would be better for both Debian
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that Jim just committed a patch based on a bug originally
> reported through the debian tracker without any additional mention here:
>
> http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commit;h=c0c8685
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
