Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed Jim fixed a couple obvious
> issues highlighted by the -Wsigned-compare gcc option
> we were talking about a few days ago.
>
> The attached patch silences all other instances,
> so that this option may be used to help find these
> hard to spot er
Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see why gcc is giving this warning, as
> there is no comparison between signed and unsigned here.
> For example in the following program compiled
> with -Wsign-compare why does the second assignment
> give a warning, while the first doesn't?
>
>
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I noticed Jim fixed a couple obvious
> issues highlighted by the -Wsigned-compare gcc option
> we were talking about a few days ago.
>
> The attached patch silences all other instances,
> so that this option may be used to help find these
> hard to spot errors, when they're
