Re: [PATCH] Use the gettime module in ls.c.

2008-02-16 Thread James Youngman
On Feb 16, 2008 9:05 PM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for reporting that. This patch should fix it. > Would you please confirm? Yes, that works. The effect of the patch on this system is that the test is now skipped instead of failing. James. __

Re: [PATCH] Use the gettime module in ls.c.

2008-02-16 Thread Jim Meyering
"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 16, 2008 6:35 PM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Both of which are checked by running "make distcheck". > > Thanks. I was unable to do that, because at the moment, tests/cp/acl > fails on my machine. I suspect this is because I a

Re: [PATCH] Use the gettime module in ls.c.

2008-02-16 Thread James Youngman
On Feb 16, 2008 6:35 PM, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Both of which are checked by running "make distcheck". Thanks. I was unable to do that, because at the moment, tests/cp/acl fails on my machine. I suspect this is because I am using a VPATH build and $PWD includes a symlink, th

Re: [PATCH] Use the gettime module in ls.c.

2008-02-16 Thread Jim Meyering
James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008-02-16 James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Implement TODO list item to make ls.c use the gettime module. > * TODO (ls): Now that we use gettime, remove the TODO entry. > * src/ls.c: Use timespec.h and the gettime module. >