Re: Problem with Date Command

2008-06-05 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [off-list, since the bulk of the patch is email addresses ;)] > > According to Philip Rowlands on 6/5/2008 7:15 AM: > |> Either the command needs to be changed or the man page needs to be > |> changed to express what the command actually does. Any assistance

Re: Problem with Date Command

2008-06-05 Thread Andreas Schwab
"Dameon G. Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bug-coreutils, > >I would like to report a problem with the *date* command: > > date +%C > > does not function properly. It says it displays the current century > but the/ definition /of century means that we are in the 21st not the > 20th.

Re: Problem with Date Command

2008-06-05 Thread Philip Rowlands
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Dameon G. Rogers wrote: Bug-coreutils, I would like to report a problem with the *date* command: date +%C does not function properly. It says it displays the current century but the/ definition /of century means that we are in the 21st not the 20th. The documenta

Re: Problem with Date Command

2008-06-05 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Dameon G. Rogers on 6/4/2008 10:09 PM: | Bug-coreutils, | |I would like to report a problem with the *date* command: | | date +%C | | does not function properly. It says it displays the current century 'date --help' (and thus th

Problem with Date Command

2008-06-05 Thread Dameon G. Rogers
Bug-coreutils, I would like to report a problem with the *date* command: date +%C does not function properly. It says it displays the current century but the/ definition /of century means that we are in the 21st not the 20th. Either the command needs to be changed or the man page ne