On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to salih k on 1/16/2010 7:32 AM:
> > Piece of Script
> > --
> >
> > /isnum=`awk -F$delim '$1=="BH"{print $5}' $fil`/
> > /
>
> That's still not exactly what you ran (you marked it up afterwards), but
>
According to salih k on 1/16/2010 7:32 AM:
> Piece of Script
> --
>
> /isnum=`awk -F$delim '$1=="BH"{print $5}' $fil`/
> /
That's still not exactly what you ran (you marked it up afterwards), but
it is close enough, I suppose.
> int_num=`echo -e $isnu
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:32 PM, salih k wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>
>> According to salih k on 1/16/2010 6:38 AM:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > thank you for the patiance ..I am sorry for being top posted.
>> > The piece of script is to check alphanumeric
>> >
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to salih k on 1/16/2010 6:38 AM:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > thank you for the patiance ..I am sorry for being top posted.
> > The piece of script is to check alphanumeric
> >
> > BH(batch header) for the file having issue is
> > BH|660|FILE
According to salih k on 1/16/2010 6:38 AM:
> Hi,
>
> thank you for the patiance ..I am sorry for being top posted.
> The piece of script is to check alphanumeric
>
> BH(batch header) for the file having issue is
> BH|660|FILE1|2009/12/30|28|28|19.80||878.000|
> IS|123|456|
> FILE2
> BH|660|FILE
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to bug-coreutils-boun...@gnu.org on 1/16/2010 12:24 AM:
> > The attached message has been automatically discarded.
> >
> >
> > ----
>
[your repeated attempts at top-posting when you have been advised not to
do so are getting annoying]
According to salih k on 1/15/2010 10:17 PM:
> Hi,
>
> 1.Linux 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 29 13:16:15 EDT 2008 x86_64
> 2.ksh
> 3.expr version:5.97
Consider upgrading - the latest stable versio
Hi,
1.Linux 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 29 13:16:15 EDT 2008 x86_64
2.ksh
3.expr version:5.97
Also,
1. the exit status coming is 1552 and in some cases 51198.Also In my
case,the $int_num will have only positive integers.
So instead of checking exit status not equal to zero for alphanumeric cha
On 11/01/10 05:50, salih k wrote:
Hi,
There is a bug iin the expr command and exit status is"51198" some times
"1552"
I have used expr to check whether the variable is numeric
add_num=`expr $int_num + 1 1>/dev/null 2>&1`
kms=$?
# if [ "$?" -ne "0" ]
if [ "$kms" -ne "0"
According to salih k on 1/10/2010 10:50 PM:
> Hi,
> There is a bug iin the expr command and exit status is"51198" some times
> "1552"
Exit status can never exceed 255 - per POSIX, it is strictly capped at 8
bits to all observers. I'm not sure where you are getting those numbers.
> I have used ex
Hi,
There is a bug iin the expr command and exit status is"51198" some times
"1552"
I have used expr to check whether the variable is numeric
add_num=`expr $int_num + 1 1>/dev/null 2>&1`
kms=$?
# if [ "$?" -ne "0" ]
if [ "$kms" -ne "0" ]
then
here $kms returns exit s
11 matches
Mail list logo
