Re: 664 vs. touch -d now

2008-01-06 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> Well at least: Ah ha, isn't "now" the current time? Bug! Muhahaha. > > Thanks for the bug report. Here is a patch. It's not that easy to > write up a test case, due to the permissions issues, so I omitted > that. > > 2008-01-

Re: 664 vs. touch -d now

2008-01-03 Thread jidanni
Thanks for fixing it, as I don't want to get that deep... OK, Over and out. ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Re: 664 vs. touch -d now

2008-01-03 Thread Paul Eggert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Well at least: Ah ha, isn't "now" the current time? Bug! Muhahaha. Thanks for the bug report. Here is a patch. It's not that easy to write up a test case, due to the permissions issues, so I omitted that. 2008-01-03 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * src/t

Re: 664 vs. touch -d now

2008-01-03 Thread Jim Meyering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Gentlemen, what's the deal, or have we been through this before and > I'm just not using the current version or something here on Debian sid > GNU/Linux 2.6.22. ... > touch (GNU coreutils) 5.97 Hi Dan Thanks for the report, but since it's against such an old version of

664 vs. touch -d now

2008-01-02 Thread jidanni
Gentlemen, what's the deal, or have we been through this before and I'm just not using the current version or something here on Debian sid GNU/Linux 2.6.22. $ ls -al drwxr-xr-x 2 jidanni jidanni 60 2008-01-03 08:40 . drwxr-xr-x 3 jidanni jidanni 60 2008-01-03 08:23 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 rootjidanni