[bug #18927] feature request: user defined format for ls output

Update of bug #18927 (project coreutils): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #18927] feature request: user defined format for ls output

Update of bug #18927 (project coreutils): Status:None => Wont Fix ___ Follow-up Comment #5: Thanks for the suggestion, but I don't want to encumber ls with such a feature.

[bug #18927] feature request: user defined format for ls output

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #18927 (project coreutils): My experience with find -printf format letters (and I'm sure of the coreutils developers with command-line option letters) is that there just aren't enough letters. The ones you end up with still available just aren't mnemonic for a new use

[bug #18927] feature request: user defined format for ls output

Update of bug #18927 (project coreutils): Severity: 3 - Normal => 1 - Wish ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #18927] feature request: user defined format for ls output

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #18927 (project coreutils): Nor colorizing the output, print sizes in human-readable format, etc, etc. find != ls ___ Reply to this item at: _

[bug #18927] feature request: user defined format for ls output

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #18927 (project coreutils): GNU find doesn't have any way of printing "foo -> bar" when foo is a symbolic link to bar, though. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #18927] feature request: user defined format for ls output

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #18927 (project coreutils): find -printf "..." has everything you need. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Nachricht geschickt vo

[bug #18927] feature request: user defined format for ls output

URL: Summary: feature request: user defined format for ls output Project: GNU Core Utilities Submitted by: barrett9h Submitted on: Thursday 02/01/2007 at 11:30 Category: None