Re: [PATCH] bootstrap: check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as well as AM_PROG_LIBTOOL

2008-10-05 Thread Debarshi Ray
> Subject: [PATCH] bootstrap: check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as well as > AM_PROG_LIBTOOL Wow! Thanks a lot. Will this make its way into build-aux/bootstrap of Gnulib as well? > * build-aux/bootstrap: Check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL, as well as the > obsolete AM_PROG_LIBTOOL. > Spotted by

Re: [PATCH] bootstrap: check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as well as AM_PROG_LIBTOOL

2008-10-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:01:14PM CEST: > "Debarshi Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Subject: [PATCH] bootstrap: check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as well as > >> AM_PROG_LIBTOOL > >> * build-aux/bootstrap: Check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL

Re: [PATCH] bootstrap: check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as well as AM_PROG_LIBTOOL

2008-10-05 Thread Jim Meyering
"Debarshi Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Subject: [PATCH] bootstrap: check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as well as >> AM_PROG_LIBTOOL > > Wow! Thanks a lot. Will this make its way into build-aux/bootstrap of > Gnulib as well? That *was* for gnulib. I'm Cc

[PATCH] bootstrap: check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as well as AM_PROG_LIBTOOL

2008-10-04 Thread Jim Meyering
>From 1ff16a1235ed546f04b219966a9142a2334a7b4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:24:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bootstrap: check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL as well as AM_PROG_LIBTOOL * build-aux/bootstrap: Check for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL, as we