Jim Meyering wrote:
rh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patches welcome, but it's already pretty well-optimized,
since it uses fts.
Sorry, fts? My TLA guessing is DOA these days.
It's not a TLA, but rather the name of a function in the C library.
Try "man fts
Jim Meyering wrote:
rh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Running du -sk on an apache disk cache containing 10GB of data and
30,000 directories and files
I see du using maybe .03% of the cpu. It takes an hour for it to complete.
If you have an old version, and depending on ho
Yes, it is io bound. Darn it. I looked at iostat and saw right away.
I first looked at vmstat but I was lulled into .believing.
Eric Blake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to rh on 4/16/2008 12:14 PM:
| Hello,
| Running du -sk on an apache disk cache
Hello,
Running du -sk on an apache disk cache containing 10GB of data and
30,000 directories and files
I see du using maybe .03% of the cpu. It takes an hour for it to complete.
Are there any plans to make du multi-threaded? Or otherwise improve
it's performance?
Is it filesystem sensitiv
