Fair enough. I didn't see anything about that in the help or man page,
perhaps a note should be added there?
On Wed., 30 Sep. 2020, 7:11 am Pádraig Brady, wrote:
> On 29/09/2020 15:20, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> >
> >> On 29/09/2020 02:18, ned haughton wrote:
> >&
When splitting with -d, the numbering screws up after 89:
```
$ wc -l ../lat_lon_full
110324 ../lat_lon_full
$ split -d ../lat_lon_full lat_lon_
$ ls
lat_lon_00 lat_lon_09 lat_lon_18 lat_lon_27 lat_lon_36 lat_lon_45
lat_lon_54 lat_lon_63 lat_lon_72 lat_lon_81 lat_lon_9000
lat_lon_900
