Hey Berny,
I like your suggestion of testing whether hashing
interferes with any other option.
I was glad to see the POSIX standard doesn't
explicitly require sorted input or output.
If someone writes the patch, I should be able to
test it, at least on up to 1 GB of input.
So,
Kingsley
On 07/1
.
So it is done.
Sorting is great, but
less is number one!
~K
PS: Congratulations on datamash performing so
well.
On 07/10/2018 12:21, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> tag 32099 notabug
> severity 32099 wishlist
> close 32099
> stop
>
> Hello Kingsley,
>
> On 09/07/18 10:2
o be faster and free from
sort.
Feel free to let me know if I screwed up.
Thanks,
Kingsley
On 07/09/2018 14:53, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> Ηello,
>
> On 08/07/18 03:03 PM, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
> > The main reason I'm writing is to humbly suggest
> > a performance
For what it's worth, I use version 8.28-1 of
Debian's coreutils package.
Thanks,
Kingsley
--
Time is the fire in which we all burn.
Thank you very much for maintaining coreutils!
It seems to me that it would be hard to
underestimate how useful it is.
The main reason I'm writing is to humbly suggest
a performance improvement to the "uniq" command.
It currently requires its input to be sorted.
Sorting generally takes about O
