On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 07:07:45PM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 6/28/25 00:21, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > I wouldn't be rushing to implement it TBH.
>
> Furthermore, -r clashes with the existing -f,--follow ... hence it's even more
> surprising that POSIX does not specify what should happen f
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 02:28:48PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 08:51:10AM -0700, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/utilities/tail.html
> > >
> > > tail -r comes from the BSDs.
> > > Also the BSDs don't have tac(1) which o
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 08:51:10AM -0700, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > >
> > > [1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/utilities/tail.html
> >
> > tail -r comes from the BSDs.
> > Also the BSDs don't have tac(1) which overlaps in functionality quite a bit.
> > I'm a bit surprised -r was add
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 06:24:45AM +0100, Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils Bug
Reports wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Thus, on Linux systems, a correct implementation of getlogin() can not
> > distinguish different users with the same uid (with reasonable effort).
> > This applies to both glibc and the new c
