>Maybe the -d option better suits your case then?
> $ du -xchd 1 ~
Yes, that is nice. Thanks!
(So many options; so little time to learn them all...)
>Arguably, this doesn't skip "dot" files and directories, as the usual shell
>globbing with '*' does.
True, but I think I can live with that.
On 7/25/25 20:25, Stan Marsh wrote:
With "du", I prefer using ~/* instead of just ~ because then you get totals for
each
(top-level) directory instead of just one grand total. And you get output as
you go,
not just at the very end (after a long wait/delay).
With 'du -sxc ~/*', you explicitly
Hi,
I think this test might often be skipped due to lack of filesystem
support? Let's try a bit harder to run it.
And let's test past timestamps too.
Thanks!
Log:
## tests: du/bigtime: Try harder to find a suitable filesystem
At least on Linux, the "usual" filesystem (ext4) doesn't support
such
Hi Paul,
Paul Eggert writes:
> +case NT_BINOP: case OT_BINOP:
> + {
> +if (l_is_l | r_is_l)
> + test_syntax_error (_("%s does not accept -l"), argv[op]);
This causes 'make syntax-check' to fail with the following:
error_quotes
test.c:332: test_synta
