bug#78562: Coreutils-9.7 do not build on macOS High Sierra, Version 10.13.6, because src/cksum.c: uses invalid cpu feature string for builtin

2025-05-23 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 23/05/2025 14:20, Peter Dyballa via GNU coreutils Bug Reports wrote: Hello! The compile used is Clang, Apple LLVM version 10.0.0 (clang-1000.11.45.5). The CPU built into the Mac is Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2860QM CPU @ 2.50GHz. The error is: mv -f src/blake2/.deps/cksum-b2sum.Tpo src/b

bug#78509: Coreutils' mv and cp 9.5 do not work properly on old PPC Mac OS X 10.4.11, Tiger

2025-05-23 Thread Peter Dyballa via GNU coreutils Bug Reports
> Am 23.05.2025 um 16:52 schrieb Peter Dyballa : > > So presumingly it's not renameatu() but rather > lib/targetdir.c:61:target_directory_operand (char const *file, struct stat > *st) that is faulty… In modern macOS target_directory_operand() returns -1, target_dirfd_valid(-1) evaluates to F

bug#78509: Coreutils' mv and cp 9.5 do not work properly on old PPC Mac OS X 10.4.11, Tiger

2025-05-23 Thread Peter Dyballa via GNU coreutils Bug Reports
Having finally managed to codesign Gdb! On macOS Sonoma 14.7.4 (intel) mv starts as on PPC Tiger. It reaches lines #457 and #459, but "target_dirfd_valid (fd)" delivers here FALSE, deduced from the fact that line #478 gets executed with errno presumingly 20 (on line #480 I can print err, which

bug#78562: Coreutils-9.7 do not build on macOS High Sierra, Version 10.13.6, because src/cksum.c: uses invalid cpu feature string for builtin

2025-05-23 Thread Peter Dyballa via GNU coreutils Bug Reports
Hello! The compile used is Clang, Apple LLVM version 10.0.0 (clang-1000.11.45.5). The CPU built into the Mac is Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2860QM CPU @ 2.50GHz. The error is: mv -f src/blake2/.deps/cksum-b2sum.Tpo src/blake2/.deps/cksum-b2sum.Po /usr/bin/clang -I. -I./lib -DHASH_ALG

bug#77597: listxattr() should return ENOTSUP for sysfs / tmpfs entries, not 0

2025-05-23 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 23/04/2025 13:22, Pádraig Brady wrote: Older coreutils was less efficient and always called getxattr("security.selinux"), and thus shows the SELinux context as expected: $ coreutils-9.3/src/ls -lZd /run/initramfs drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 60 Apr 19 14:52 /

bug#78509: Coreutils' mv and cp 9.5 do not work properly on old PPC Mac OS X 10.4.11, Tiger

2025-05-23 Thread Peter Dyballa via GNU coreutils Bug Reports
When using Gdb I skip in mv.c's main() function over the first few calls and come to the while loop, line #344. It is entered and 378 target_directory = optarg;. is – visited? The name "out" contains a "t" which is also listed in the list of command line options. After the while l

bug#78509: Coreutils' mv and cp 9.5 do not work properly on old PPC Mac OS X 10.4.11, Tiger

2025-05-23 Thread Peter Dyballa via GNU coreutils Bug Reports
Paul, I have a strange effect when building coreutils 9.7 with MacPorts. Yesterday I tried to build with -O0 – and it failed! This morning I repeated it – with same result: /opt/local/bin/gcc-apple-4.2 -std=gnu99 -I. -I./lib -Ilib -I./lib -Isrc -I./src -I/opt/local/include -fPIC -p

bug#78509: Coreutils' mv and cp 9.5 do not work properly on old PPC Mac OS X 10.4.11, Tiger

2025-05-23 Thread Peter Dyballa via GNU coreutils Bug Reports
Hello Pádraig! Yesterday coreutils did not build because of use of -O0 instead of -Os before. This morning I am using simply -O, and the tests stop at the test after existing-perm-dir.sh (last line in build log), which is existing-perm-race.sh. coreutils-9.7/tests/cp has: -rw-r--r-- 1

bug#78476: GNU 'factor' problems with 128-bit word

2025-05-23 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 5/20/25 09:04, Torbjörn Granlund wrote: The current factor.c code is becoming insanely complex. Contructs masking bugs triggered on hypothetical systems doesn't help with managing complexity. If such hardware seems to be quite some time away, what about guarding the code for the ranges we k