On 08/04/2025 08:06, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 2025-04-07 15:52, Pádraig Brady wrote:
So maybe we class this as a kernel bug and have the kernel
return non 0 for this case, or even ENOTSUP.
Yes, this sounds right to me. The kernel should not pretend that there
are no attributes when there are attr
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I'll also apply this logic to has_capability_cache().
Yes, the same mistake is lurking there as well.
Bruno
On 2025-04-07 15:52, Pádraig Brady wrote:
So maybe we class this as a kernel bug and have the kernel
return non 0 for this case, or even ENOTSUP.
Yes, this sounds right to me. The kernel should not pretend that there
are no attributes when there are attributes. If the kernel doesn't want
to t
