On 25/09/2024 20:55, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 2024-09-25 08:14, Pádraig Brady wrote:
It seems better to move the checks within the macro to avoid any future
issues.
I've also applied the same check to rsh2 in the attached.
That patch doesn't suffice (nor does Artem's) because the count can be
neg
On 2024-09-25 08:14, Pádraig Brady wrote:
It seems better to move the checks within the macro to avoid any future
issues.
I've also applied the same check to rsh2 in the attached.
That patch doesn't suffice (nor does Artem's) because the count can be
negative. I'll take a further look at this
On 25/09/2024 11:26, Артем Насонов wrote:
To whom it may concern,
I’m writing to let you know that I found an issue by fuzzing in
coreutils in *factor* utility and want to report it. Here are some details:
1. Host architecture: Host it Debian x86_64 architecture
2. factor version: factor (GNU c
To whom it may concern,
I’m writing to let you know that I found an issue by fuzzing in
coreutils in *factor* utility and want to report it. Here are some details:
1. Host architecture: Host it Debian x86_64 architecture
2. factor version: factor (GNU coreutils) 9.5.94-5cecd
3. Affected code a
