Thanks for the clarification and patch
On 16/04/2024 at 23:17, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 4/16/24 14:30, Toby Kelsey wrote:
The man page doesn't explain this format conflict, while the info page
(info '(coreutils) ls invocation' or 'info ls') claims '-f' implies
'-1' which is also incorrect: 'ls -1
On 4/16/24 14:30, Toby Kelsey wrote:
The man page doesn't explain this format conflict, while the info page
(info '(coreutils) ls invocation' or 'info ls') claims '-f' implies '-1'
which is also incorrect: 'ls -1f' gives different output to to 'ls -f'.
Yes, this area of GNU 'ls' a mess. Option
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:33:44 +0100
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 16/04/2024 01:19, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I don't own a Darwin system, so I can't help much reproduce. However,
> > I've received a bug report to the Linux man-pages, that our build
> > system (GNUmakefile-based), whi
The man page doesn't explain this format conflict, while the info page (info '(coreutils) ls invocation' or 'info ls')
claims '-f' implies '-1' which is also incorrect: 'ls -1f' gives different output to to 'ls -f'.
I am using coreutils 9.4-3 in Manjaro and the online documentation for 9.5
On 4/16/24 12:44, Pádraig Brady wrote:
A related suggestion was from Marc Chantreux (CC'd)
to support '-' to imply stdin, which would be more portable.
There is some merit to that suggestion too.
I see that merit too, as when 'install' reads from stdin it needn't do
the inode check. However, P
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 08:44:06PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I agree if it's older Darwin only, we can ignore.
> The version I tested on is 3 years old now though,
> so I'm not sure whether the issue is on newer or older.
>
> Note we had similar issue on Solaris,
> where we used an fstat(
On 4/16/24 07:47, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Since you couldn't reprodude it in a recent Darwin, maybe it's
just a bug in an old Darwin.
It'd have to be pretty old. As near as I can see from
xnu/bsd/kern/sys_pipe.c, the st_ino field was zero (i.e., not random)
even in xnu-792 dated 2005.
I'd
On 16/04/2024 15:47, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi Pádraig,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 03:25:22PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
What version of darwin is this? I can't repro on Darwin 21.6.0 (MacOSX 12.6).
The issue seems to be that /dev/stdin returns a varying inode which install(1)
doesn't like cur
On 16/04/2024 at 16:07, Toby Kelsey wrote:
There appears to be a bug with 'ls' when using the '-f' and '-l'
options, or at least an inconsistency with the man page. The man page
says '-f' list entries in directory order and does not mention any
incompatibilities with other options, however I
There appears to be a bug with 'ls' when using the '-f' and '-l' options, or at least an inconsistency with the man
page. The man page says '-f' list entries in directory order and does not mention any incompatibilities with other
options, however I find using it with the '-l' option gives differ
Hi Pádraig,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 03:25:22PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > What version of darwin is this? I can't repro on Darwin 21.6.0 (MacOSX
> > 12.6).
> > The issue seems to be that /dev/stdin returns a varying inode which
> > install(1) doesn't like currently
I don't know. The repor
On 16/04/2024 12:33, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 16/04/2024 01:19, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi!
I don't own a Darwin system, so I can't help much reproduce. However,
I've received a bug report to the Linux man-pages, that our build
system (GNUmakefile-based), which ends up calling
... | i
On 16/04/2024 01:19, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hi!
I don't own a Darwin system, so I can't help much reproduce. However,
I've received a bug report to the Linux man-pages, that our build
system (GNUmakefile-based), which ends up calling
... | install /dev/stdin $@
doesn't work on Darwi
13 matches
Mail list logo