fold -s will break at spaces.
But why not let the user also pick an arbitrary character, other than
spaces, too?
On 21/02/17 20:01, Assaf Gordon wrote:
>
>> On Feb 21, 2017, at 22:32, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>
>> This was discussed at http://bugs.gnu.org/20874
>
> Missed that - sorry. I should've looked through the archives first...
>
>> I'm not sure anything needs to be done here,
>> since for backward com
> On Feb 21, 2017, at 22:32, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
> This was discussed at http://bugs.gnu.org/20874
Missed that - sorry. I should've looked through the archives first...
> I'm not sure anything needs to be done here,
> since for backward compat for concat operations
> expecting lexical sort
unarchive 20874
forcemerge 20874 25832
stop
On 21/02/17 18:40, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> On Feb 21, 2017, at 19:55, Holger Wolff
>> wrote:
>>
>> Incorrect numeric suffixes are sometimes produced when going beyond number
>> 89:
>> Assume a file "test.txt" with 1000 lines, and the comman
Hello,
> On Feb 21, 2017, at 19:55, Holger Wolff
> wrote:
>
> Incorrect numeric suffixes are sometimes produced when going beyond number 89:
> Assume a file "test.txt" with 1000 lines, and the command
>
> $ split -d -l 10 test.txt test_
>
> I expect files test_00 through test_99, but what I g
Hello
Incorrect numeric suffixes are sometimes produced when going beyond
number 89:
Assume a file "test.txt" with 1000 lines, and the command
$ split -d -l 10 test.txt test_
I expect files test_00 through test_99, but what I get are test_00
through test_89 and test_9000 through test_9009.
Eric Blake wrote:
the discussion here is about an early exit
on an attempt to remove '.', which, contrary to your claim, appears to
always have been in POSIX as far as I can tell (and even if it has not
always been in POSIX, the fact that I can quote a 20-year-old document
that describes curre
On 02/21/2017 05:42 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
"If either of the files dot or dot-dot are specified as the basename
portion of an operand (that is, the final pathname component), rm will
write a diagnostic message to standard error and do nothing more with
such operands."
The same wording is in the
On 02/21/2017 07:42 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 02:41 AM, L A Walsh wrote:
>>
>> Do you really need me to find the older version
>> of 'rm' in your source tree?
>
> It wouldn't hurt to point out which commit id changed behavior, if you
> indeed want to call that commit a regression.
On 02/21/2017 02:41 AM, L A Walsh wrote:
>
> Do you really need me to find the older version
> of 'rm' in your source tree?
It wouldn't hurt to point out which commit id changed behavior, if you
indeed want to call that commit a regression. Being able to read the
commit itself, as well as ma
Or are you arguing that contents within the directory should be removed,
even though the directory itself cannot be?
---
That's the way a recursive descent algorithm
works: it processes the contents, before the parents.
When it gets to the parent, it couldn't remove it, but
due to th
On 20/02/17 23:18, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> Hi Padraig,
>
> only some minor remarks from my side.
>
> On 02/21/2017 04:11 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> From d17ca013f3aadcf697663830fa9ec34cba551f66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?UTF-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?=
>> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:46:
12 matches
Mail list logo