tests/misc/ls-time

2010-01-16 Thread Michael Stone
It seems that touch -a does update ctime on btrfs, invalidating one of the assumptions behind this test and causing it to fail. Mike Stone

Judy arrays much faster than standard sort?

2010-01-16 Thread Leszek Dubiel
I have found that Judy arrays are faster than standard "sort" program about 10 times. This is a little bit strange, because I expected sort to be fastest tool ever. Heres is my session: les...@jowisz$ wc input 100 100 5659335 input les...@jowisz$ time ./judy < input > outpu

Re: Incorrect use of USE_XATTR in coreutils-8.4

2010-01-16 Thread Eric Blake
According to Pádraig Brady on 1/16/2010 9:33 AM: > Eric, you forgot to attached your patch. > Oops. -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake e...@byu.net From e8115ecac17b200edc07fc057e7d31788fb4c2fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Blake Date: Sat, 16

Re: Incorrect use of USE_XATTR in coreutils-8.4

2010-01-16 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 16/01/10 11:42, Adam Sampson wrote: Hiya, I've just built coreutils 8.4 on a machine with libattr installed, and found that tests/cp/cp-mv-enotsup-xattr was failing because cp was incorrectly giving the "cp is built without xattr support" error message. The problem appears to be that the conf

Re: Bug in expr***urgent

2010-01-16 Thread salih k
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > According to salih k on 1/16/2010 6:38 AM: > > > Hi, > > > > thank you for the patiance ..I am sorry for being top posted. > > The piece of script is to check alphanumeric > > > > BH(batch header) for the file having issue is > > BH|660|FILE

Re: Bug in expr***urgent

2010-01-16 Thread Eric Blake
According to salih k on 1/16/2010 6:38 AM: > Hi, > > thank you for the patiance ..I am sorry for being top posted. > The piece of script is to check alphanumeric > > BH(batch header) for the file having issue is > BH|660|FILE1|2009/12/30|28|28|19.80||878.000| > IS|123|456| > FILE2 > BH|660|FILE

Re: Incorrect use of USE_XATTR in coreutils-8.4

2010-01-16 Thread Eric Blake
According to Adam Sampson on 1/16/2010 4:42 AM: > Hiya, > > I've just built coreutils 8.4 on a machine with libattr installed, and > found that tests/cp/cp-mv-enotsup-xattr was failing because cp was > incorrectly giving the "cp is built without xattr support" error > message. The problem appears

Re: Auto-discard notification (was Re: Bug in expr***urgent)

2010-01-16 Thread salih k
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > According to bug-coreutils-boun...@gnu.org on 1/16/2010 12:24 AM: > > The attached message has been automatically discarded. > > > > > > > > > > Subject: > > Re: Bug in ex

Incorrect use of USE_XATTR in coreutils-8.4

2010-01-16 Thread Adam Sampson
Hiya, I've just built coreutils 8.4 on a machine with libattr installed, and found that tests/cp/cp-mv-enotsup-xattr was failing because cp was incorrectly giving the "cp is built without xattr support" error message. The problem appears to be that the configure script defines USE_XATTR to "yes" i

side-effect implementing the mv command

2010-01-16 Thread Derick Centeno
Recently I executed the following: $ sudo mv ./libjavaplugin_oji.so /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins Explanation: I was within the directory where the java plugin existed which is: /opt/ibm/java-ppc-60/jre/plugin/ppc/ns7. The above was executed from within the ns7 directory. The intention was to move